Covid-19 related debates (argue in this thread only)

[Hacky McAxe]

Exact responses I expected. Conspiracy rubbish with little care for facts. Not wasting my time on another nutjob.

 

[Tlamb]

Exact responses I expected. Conspiracy rubbish with little care for facts. Not wasting my time on another nutjob.

Ah, the old conspiracy diatribe again.

How have all those forecasts turned out?

 

[Dogna88]

No, i gave the name Kate Wagstaffe from Monash university.

And thats been talked about OVER AND OVER.

Fmd mate. If you want to seem smart. At least keep up with the coversations on here

 

[Tlamb]

Exact responses I expected. Conspiracy rubbish with little care for facts. Not wasting my time on another nutjob.

Whilst your compiling your list of “experts” ( which you haven’t at all surprise surprise) why don’t you name all the conspiracy links i’ve posted and explain how they are a conspiracy.

Unless of course you’re not telling the truth.

 

[Dogna88]

“The truth that they have been wrong at every turn re covid and people still lap it up like Morons”.

It’s based in Canberra.

Really? Like REALLY? we have to do this again?

Back to burden of proof and correlation.

Actually. No. Cbf doing it again. Read previous posts with an open mind when you're on smoko

 

[Tlamb]

And thats been talked about OVER AND OVER.

Fmd mate. If you want to seem smart. At least keep up with the coversations on here

You said i don’t supply any sources. I was reminding you of where i provided a source.

Don’t get yourself confused.

 

[Tlamb]

Really? Like REALLY? we have to do this again?

Back to burden of proof and correlation.

Actually. No. Cbf doing it again. Read previous posts with an open mind when you're on smoko

Or, you could explain your take outs from the peer reviewed Forbes article that you discredited.

 

[Dogna88]

Whilst your compiling your list of “experts” ( which you haven’t at all surprise surprise) why don’t you name all the conspiracy links i’ve posted and explain how they are a conspiracy.

Unless of course you’re not telling the truth.

You've been moved to the irrelevant basket mate.

Keep fighting the revolution from telegram.

VIVA LA UNEDUCATED

 

[Dogna88]

Or, you could explain your take outs from the peer reviewed Forbes article that you discredited.

ITS BEEN DONE. Over and over and over

You dont understand simple science.

You just regurgitate what you see on telegram. And when you csnt answer a question. You just regurgitate the same thing.

You're not taken seriously.

 

[Tlamb]

ITS BEEN DONE. Over and over and over

You dont understand simple science.

You just regurgitate what you see on telegram. And when you csnt answer a question. You just regurgitate the same thing.

You're not taken seriously.

Speaking of which, if you claim an article isn’t correct then list your take outs which prove your theory.

It’s a forbes article and it’s not from Telegram so there’s that.

you sound like you’re in a hole and aren’t sure how to get out of it.

 

[Tlamb]

And thats been talked about OVER AND OVER.

Fmd mate. If you want to seem smart. At least keep up with the coversations on here

If you want to seem smart, explain to me why the monash study was pushed back for release from June 2021 to the end of 2022.

If you can do that then I’ll listen to you but if you can’t then you really don’t know anything about the study at all and are pretending to. Your call.

 

[Dogna88]

Speaking of which, if you claim an article isn’t correct then list your take outs which prove your theory.

It’s a forbes article and it’s not from Telegram so there’s that.

you sound like you’re in a hole and aren’t sure how to get out of it.

Nope. The way you have interpreted the data is wrong. But that has already been discussed

 

[Dogna88]

If you want to seem smart, explain to me why the monash study was pushed back for release from June 2021 to the end of 2022.

If you can do that then I’ll listen to you but if you can’t then you really don’t know anything about the study at all and are pretending to. Your call.

Because the Lizard people are holding it back. Information in the study will reveal their existence and that might compromise their anal rape mission. Prove me wrong

 

[DinkumDog]

You said i don’t supply any sources. I was reminding you of where i provided a source.

A source already widely discredited.
Yet you quote it again (mis-spelled again) - why?

 

[Tlamb]

A source already widely discredited.
Yet you quote it again (mis-spelled again) - why?

It hasn’t been discredited at all. It was up to the human trial stage lol. You discrediting it doesn’t make it discredited. Fyi.

 

[Tlamb]

A source already widely discredited.
Yet you quote it again (mis-spelled again) - why?

You didn’t even know the study existed a day ago lol

 

[Tlamb]

Nope. The way you have interpreted the data is wrong. But that has already been discussed

The way the CDC and WHO have interpreted data has been wrong the whole time. What’s your point?

 

[DinkumDog]

It hasn’t been discredited at all. It was up to the human trial stage lol. You discrediting it doesn’t make it discredited. Fyi.

Ummm ‘widely’ discredited doesn’t mean just me.
Plenty of evidence. Even she did a u-turn and told people not to take Ivermectin.
You’re really struggling with simple concepts .

 

[DinkumDog]

You didn’t even know the study existed a day ago lol

Wrong again.
I had to refresh myself on the topic given the ‘information’ you provided was from 2020 .

 

[Dogna88]

The way the CDC and WHO have interpreted data has been wrong the whole time. What’s your point?

You're an idiot who has no idea about virology or just science in general.

IF you want to prove them wrong. You have to provide evidence (not opinion, not correlation assumptions) actual analytical evidence to counter their position.