Coronavirus.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lov_Dog

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
1,697
This is my point. Biological Men should go to the men’s bathroom and same for women.
What is the biological gender of XO, XXY and XYY individuals?


"Biological Men should go to the men’s bathroom and same for women."
> actually translates to women should go into men's bathroom.

#socialism
#USAallCauseMortalityYearOnYear
 

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
What is the biological gender of XO, XXY and XYY individuals?


"Biological Men should go to the men’s bathroom and same for women."
> actually translates to women should go into men's bathroom.

#socialism
#USAallCauseMortalityYearOnYear
Those issues have always existed in terms of those people and there have generally been satisfactory work around a with unisex and disabled bathrooms available. But forcing all of society to suddenly change the approach to use of bathrooms does not make sense for a tiny percentage of people.
 

Mr 95%

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
22,205
Reaction score
22,903
I thought they had a rule, as with aged care health workers, that they could only work at one venue?
I’m not sure WD.. But boy they need to follow protocols..if she did get it from the quarantine hotel than it’s a disgrace!
edit..the woman did not get covid from a local transmission..it is from an overseas traveler. It is good news, in the fact the virus is not ‘out’ in the community, but not good that she got it and then moved through the community..it only takes one to set off a chain reaction.. I find it really disappointing that the community does such a good job, and than is let down by such incidents..
 
Last edited:

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
The fuck has that got to do American drs and nurse's and being stretched and frustrated?
You asked whether nurses and doctors should have to look after ‘selfish fucks’. Which is a hell of a thing to say about people who may be about to die or possibly after already died.

You asked, so I drew your attention to the very basis of medical practitioners which is an oath which they each swear to uphold which also means that they commit to provide care to anyone regardless of their beliefs or background.
 

south of heaven

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
29,247
Reaction score
25,695
You asked whether nurses and doctors should have to look after ‘selfish fucks’. Which is a hell of a thing to say about people who may be about to die or possibly after already died.

You asked, so I drew your attention to the very basis of medical practitioners which is an oath which they each swear to uphold which also means that they commit to provide care to anyone regardless of their beliefs or background.
No I asked if it was fair ? Simple question really so you pulling up and Australian oath is totally irrelevant
 

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
No I asked if it was fair ? Simple question really so you pulling up and Australian oath is totally irrelevant
Is it fair for nurses and doctors to treat anyone who in some way contributes to their own illness?

Alcoholics who end up in hospital?
Drug addicts
Skin cancers from a lifestyle spent outdoors under the sun
Obese individuals who consumed too much food and sugar?
Cigarette smokers who ended up with lung cancer?
Criminals who get shot and stabbed and require medical treatment?

Or does this standard just apply to COVID patients?
 

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
And your argument is ignorant of the fact one is a health official who is quietly going about their job while the other is a socialite who publicly flaunts where they live, where they go, what they do, why they do it, who they do it with and above all how much it is worth. You are also ignorant of the fact intimidation is what the Trumps, all the Trumps, try and do to everyone else so seeing them get some of their own medicine = boo farking hoo!

We may have to extend your column of ignorance to keep accommodating your ever growing list.
How about these 1000 U.S. health officials who claimed that black lives matter riots were 'safe'?


So it was Ok to go out and riot for 'black people' - but you most definitely can not go to church and you most definitely can not see your family at Thanksgiving and Christmas!
 

KambahOne

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
3,659
Reaction score
4,735
How about these 1000 U.S. health officials who claimed that black lives matter riots were 'safe'?


So it was Ok to go out and riot for 'black people' - but you most definitely can not go to church and you most definitely can not see your family at Thanksgiving and Christmas!
12:30 and if you keep licking it will never heal.
 

south of heaven

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
29,247
Reaction score
25,695
No I asked if it was fair ? Simple question really so you pulling up and Australian oath is totally irrelevant
When they are dealing with as above mentioned and the added stress of dealing with people who by just sacrificing a little to help their country. I'd be pissed something simple as a mask and people like yourself who find one article about how masks are not 100% accurate yet you continue to run with it .fucking oath i would be pissed and stressed and its getting a lot worse
 

Lov_Dog

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
1,697
Those issues have always existed in terms of those people and there have generally been satisfactory work around a with unisex and disabled bathrooms available. But forcing all of society to suddenly change the approach to use of bathrooms does not make sense for a tiny percentage of people.
Perfect!
Thanks for clearing up your own non-problem you raised - single bathrooms for all!
No invasive checks required at entry and one can do as they please in there.

Now to address how to deal with those MASSIVE DUMPS
 

Lov_Dog

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
2,994
Reaction score
1,697
Is it fair for nurses and doctors to treat anyone who in some way contributes to their own illness?

Alcoholics who end up in hospital?
Drug addicts
Skin cancers from a lifestyle spent outdoors under the sun
Obese individuals who consumed too much food and sugar?
Cigarette smokers who ended up with lung cancer?
Criminals who get shot and stabbed and require medical treatment?

Or does this standard just apply to COVID patients?

The New US “Conscience and Religious Freedom Division”: Imposing Religious Beliefs on Others

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993366/

"The core mission of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is “to enhance and protect the health and well-being of all Americans.” The Trump administration recently announced the creation of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division (CRFD) of the DHHS Office for Civil Rights to accept complaints by health care providers who feel that they have had to participate in medical procedures counter to their religious values. The CRFD directly contradicts the DHHS mission as well as standards of medical ethics."

Trans patients ?
Women who had abortions ?

Choose carefully, your hypocrisy is on show.
 

The DoggFather

OG DF
Premium Member
Gilded
Site's Top Poster
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
106,433
Reaction score
117,589



The New US “Conscience and Religious Freedom Division”: Imposing Religious Beliefs on Others

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993366/

"The core mission of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is “to enhance and protect the health and well-being of all Americans.” The Trump administration recently announced the creation of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division (CRFD) of the DHHS Office for Civil Rights to accept complaints by health care providers who feel that they have had to participate in medical procedures counter to their religious values. The CRFD directly contradicts the DHHS mission as well as standards of medical ethics."

Trans patients ?
Women who had abortions ?

Choose carefully, your hypocrisy is on show.
Like usual...

 

south of heaven

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
29,247
Reaction score
25,695
Trumps we are turning a corner vaccine won't be this big miracle oh and there's a thing in there about masks
The fast-tracked coronavirus vaccines will come too late to spare the United States an unprecedented surge in deaths this winter, with covid-19-related deaths likely to reach 539,000 by April, according to a new estimate Friday by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation model.
Despite efforts to scale up vaccine production and distribution, probably only 9,000 lives will be spared by immunizations, according to IHME.
“The vaccine has not come in time to do much about the winter wave,” institute Director Christopher Murray told The Post.
As the daily death toll is expected to peak at nearly 3,000 in mid- to late January, the model forecasts that more lives would probably be saved with universal masking or states’ governors ramping up other mandates — suggestions that are not new to the public health realm.
For instance, the simulation suggests that if mask use increased to 95 percent nationally, 66,000 lives would be saved by April. Even though the estimate accounts for 43 states reimposing mandates before April, if state leaders decide to take the opposite approach and ease restrictions, the projection assumes deaths would rise to 770,000 by April.
A quicker rollout of an effective vaccine could still save lives, but it wouldn’t put as much of a dent in the nation’s death toll: 11,000 lives will be spared by a rapid release of the vaccine, or 14,000 if the launch targeted high-risk individuals
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
17,874
Reaction score
25,382
Trumps we are turning a corner vaccine won't be this big miracle oh and there's a thing in there about masks
The fast-tracked coronavirus vaccines will come too late to spare the United States an unprecedented surge in deaths this winter, with covid-19-related deaths likely to reach 539,000 by April, according to a new estimate Friday by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation model.
Despite efforts to scale up vaccine production and distribution, probably only 9,000 lives will be spared by immunizations, according to IHME.
“The vaccine has not come in time to do much about the winter wave,” institute Director Christopher Murray told The Post.
As the daily death toll is expected to peak at nearly 3,000 in mid- to late January, the model forecasts that more lives would probably be saved with universal masking or states’ governors ramping up other mandates — suggestions that are not new to the public health realm.
For instance, the simulation suggests that if mask use increased to 95 percent nationally, 66,000 lives would be saved by April. Even though the estimate accounts for 43 states reimposing mandates before April, if state leaders decide to take the opposite approach and ease restrictions, the projection assumes deaths would rise to 770,000 by April.
A quicker rollout of an effective vaccine could still save lives, but it wouldn’t put as much of a dent in the nation’s death toll: 11,000 lives will be spared by a rapid release of the vaccine, or 14,000 if the launch targeted high-risk individuals
A truly human tragedy. Largely avoidable, and yet it still happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top