He is better. Offers way more in attack. Love Josh Jackson though.Wade graham’s Better than josh Jackson, now ?
Wade graham is the forward version of josh Reynolds.He is better. Offers way more in attack. Love Josh Jackson though.
Lol, you must not watch any Sharks games because Wade is an excellent player.Wade graham is the forward version of josh Reynolds.
Tries really hard but is clearly clumsy and receives most of his praise through pity.
Sadly, due to being a shift worker on a shift with only sharks fans, I watch nearly all sharks games.Lol, you must not watch any Sharks games because Wade is an excellent player.
Wow, if you think he is an average player then you have no idea.Sadly, due to being a shift worker on a shift with only sharks fans, I watch nearly all sharks games.
He’s an excellent trier, but an average player.
And here he goes again. Mr know it allWade graham is the forward version of josh Reynolds.
Tries really hard but is clearly clumsy and receives most of his praise through pity.
Inglis and RTS have done nothing the last 2 years. They have both been a waste of money.Mitchell Pearce is higher than Greg Inglis and RTS. Not only pissed but needs to put down the crack pipe.
Yes I simply don’t rate Mitchell Pearce. I would rather have Rts and Inglis over him any day. I think he is the most overrated player in the league. His origin record speaks for itself.Inglis and RTS have done nothing the last 2 years. They have both been a waste of money.
He is crap at Origin level but really good at NRL level. At least he has won games for his team the last 2 years. Inglis doesn't play and RTS went to kill his career at the Warriors.Yes I simply don’t rate Mitchell Pearce. I would rather have Rts and Inglis over him any day. I think he is the most overrated player in the league. His origin record speaks for itself.
Last two years shouldn't count. This list should be current meaning now, both RTS and Inglis are fit and I would have them over Pearce.He is crap at Origin level but really good at NRL level. At least he has won games for his team the last 2 years. Inglis doesn't play and RTS went to kill his career at the Warriors.
His top 50 is based on performances. Off course the last 2 years count. You can't just assume RTS is going to play good now after 2 years of crap.Last two years shouldn't count. This list should be current meaning now, both RTS and Inglis are fit and I would have them over Pearce.
Yes i agree he should be top 50, but top 20 I think not. You can't assume he will play well now but based on talent and past experience he is a more valuable player. Yes the last two years should count which included two failed origin campaigns, after 7 attempts. Also last two years he has failed to steer his salary cap rorting team in the GF.His top 50 is based on performances. Off course the last 2 years count. You can't just assume RTS is going to play good now after 2 years of crap.
Pretty sure this is based on just NRL level not rep.Yes i agree he should be top 50, but top 20 I think not. You can't assume he will play well now but based on talent and past experience he is a more valuable player. Yes the last two years should count which included two failed origin campaigns, after 7 attempts. Also last two years he has failed to steer his salary cap rorting team in the GF.