- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37,172
- Reaction score
- 29,700
They'll usually name him after it goes to trial, or when he gets indicted.Will they ever name the rapist?
They'll usually name him after it goes to trial, or when he gets indicted.Will they ever name the rapist?
Apparently it was on Insta but not sure now.Will they ever name the rapist?
Alleged at this stageWill they ever name the rapist?
Alleged at this stage
Sorry.They'll usually name him after it goes to trial, or when he gets indicted.
Nah, it causes potential damage problems. A person can't be named until they are taken into police custody. If the press name a person and that person is injured or killed, the press are responsible. If the person is taken into police custody and then gets out on bail, then gets killed. It's their own fault for not staying under the protection of the police.Sorry.
That was my mistake.
It is alleged rapist, and I do know that he will be named (if charged) unless there is a suppression order from the courts.
I just find it curious that with all this scrutiny on these allegations that he hasn't been named by a newspaper as the alleged rapist.
Hasn't she now made a statement to the AFP? Surely he can be named as a person of interest?
Swept under a rug no doubtWill they ever name the rapist?
WTF? Grub..of the highest order.
Na sis, just talking more in general, all the people that actually buy into the left v right diversion.I only support the petition to diversify our media ownership if its me you are referring to.
Reminds me of that other stupid cuntrash who compared women to uncovered meat.
You asking a man who sees what the media is about this?What if someone puts up a post about Turnbull complaining about Murdoch media. Is that still putting party first?
Just want to reiterate, I post bc of issues not party and always encourage others to do the same.
Regards of politics, Rudd makes some valid points.
Yes mate except that Turnbull has joined with Rudd to expose the corruption of Murdoch.You asking a man who sees what the media is about this?
To TRY to answer your question, more than likely right wingers would try to justify Turdbull and the left would attack him.
The opposite would happen if Turdbull was a labor ****.
His name is out there FYI, he's checked himself into the hospital last week.Sorry.
That was my mistake.
It is alleged rapist, and I do know that he will be named (if charged) unless there is a suppression order from the courts.
I just find it curious that with all this scrutiny on these allegations that he hasn't been named by a newspaper as the alleged rapist.
Hasn't she now made a statement to the AFP? Surely he can be named as a person of interest?
No sorry bro, I'm going to completely disagree with you here.You asking a man who sees what the media is about this?
To TRY to answer your question, more than likely right wingers would try to justify Turdbull and the left would attack him.
The opposite would happen if Turdbull was a labor ****.
Just wish he stood up like this when he was PM.BTW, for anyone curious, here's the cut down version of Turnbull attacking Murdoch Media on Q&A
A third woman has just come forward alleging rape against the same guy.His name is out there FYI, he's checked himself into the hospital last week.
A 2nd woman has come out and claimed rape against the same individual after Brittany Higgins
There's a lot of conflicting statements coming out of the PMO and text messages which indicate the PM was told when it happened. The PM himself has slipped up giving a press statement about the date he knew ( he said April 5th 2019 but then corrected himself to 12th feb 2021, the rape happened April 3rd 2019).
As wendog has said another sham investigation by Morrison has been set up, which will be conducted by gaetjens, the same individual who conducted the sports rorts investigation and told everyone to move on theres nothing to see here.
Lastly Brittany Higgins decided to come forward after she saw the PM standing next to Grace Tame at the Australian of the year awards. Grace Tame was pursued by a paedophile (when she was 15 years old)
That's why I said TRY to answer it lolNo sorry bro, I'm going to completely disagree with you here.
Turnbull showed massive balls on a recent Q and A attacking the Australians former editor. Everyone was asking where the fuck was this turnbull before.
As for Rudd, Rudd's past shit stains are well documented, everyone knows about it, his own Labor colleagues have complained, publicly, about his behaviour.
To attack rudd now is just a diversion tactic, it's a blatant "look over there" attempt.
Murdoch press and TV stations are a shit stain here, in the US, and in the UK.
Fox news helped propagate January 6th in DC
The Sun does not even attempt to sell in Liverpool, England because the WHOLE CITY boycotted that tabloid for their lies about the hillsborough event
Murdoch's news of the world had a major worldwide incident where they hacked into people's phones
Murdoch is one of the most evil pieces of shit in the western world. His empire needs to be brought down
Look the major benefit in this being Rudd is that all his dirty laundry is already out in the open, so he's got nothing to fear from the character assassination that the Murdoch press usually does to make these things go away.That's why I said TRY to answer it lol
FFS I agree with most of the post that you used to disagree with me....****!
PS Murdoch has to be used as evidence that the devil exists.
I used to think that the governments were more powerful and control the media, honestly, recently I'm thinking it's the other way around.Look the major benefit in this being Rudd is that all his dirty laundry is already out in the open, so he's got nothing to fear from the character assassination that the Murdoch press usually does to make these things go away.
Rudd so is the right person to pursue this, his dirty laundry everyone already knows and he has massive influence being a former PM.
And yep Murdoch is an evil piece of shit. The conservatives still do his bidding here, US and UK.
Even this Facebook shit, I mean imagine this government initially didn't include ABC and SBS in the deal with Facebook, because they were only thinking of Murdoch and stokes.