Meaney for fullback. I thought he has shown enough in his early days to be a potent player in years to come. Yes dwz runs harder on kick returns, but this is suited to winger play these days anyway.
Agree
Meaney to fullback. Why, cause he is a fullback not a winger. Good under the high ball. DWZ offers nothing more than Meaney at fullback.
DWZ to wing. Why, cause he isnt setting the world on fire at fullback. Has height, strength, isnt expected to pass the ball for the most part. Looks to be what a current day winger looks like.
Smith back to wing. Why because he plays better on the wing and looks out of sorts in the centres.
Straight up 2 positions strengthened and maybe the 3rd now that Meaney has progressed in first grade.
I dont know what Im missing, this just seems so logical to me.
Play players to their strengths in there natural positions first than work out who we need to buy.
Once again, probably missing something, seems like common sense to me.