- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Messages
- 22,711
- Reaction score
- 41,541
BOOM! Obviously comedy doesn't pay your bills champnot surpising you are the expert on hookers.
BOOM! Obviously comedy doesn't pay your bills champnot surpising you are the expert on hookers.
Actually. That'd be me mate. That'd be menot surpising you are the expert on hookers.
Learn something every day mateActually. That'd be me mate. That'd be me
Aussie meat is valuable over here mate. I can get top dollar for a piece of my arse. And then there's the Eastern European women ... Oh la laLearn something every day mate
I'll leave you to your extra curricular activities...
JO met the girl at school. CHN met his girl in tinder and did not know she was a schoolgirl. Big difference.Can you tell me why the condemnation of JO and not CHN. How is it different if they were both "SchoolGirls", is you view obscured because you feel the CHN is more valued as a player.
It depends on your definition of "met", if I get my picture taken with a 100 of so people in a day, maybe or maybe not spoke to half of them, don't recall any of them really, wouldn't recognise them later, is that your definition of "met"? My definition of "met" is a face to face meeting, introduction with an exchange of names, a handshake perhaps. Some people apply even more to the word "met", in this case they are using it as a substitute for "chatted up". Such as Okunbor "chatted up" the girl at the school, exchanged phone numbers, then hooked up later. Which the evidence (that we have seen) plainly is not the case.JO met the girl at school. CHN met his girl in tinder and did not know she was a schoolgirl. Big difference.
I fully agree with you,my comments are directed at the audience who have been manipulatedIt depends on your definition of "met", if I get my picture taken with a 100 of so people in a day, maybe or maybe not spoke to half of them, don't recall any of them really, wouldn't recognise them later, is that your definition of "met"? My definition of "met" is a face to face meeting, introduction with an exchange of names, a handshake perhaps. Some people apply even more to the word "met", in this case they are using it as a substitute for "chatted up". Such as Okunbor "chatted up" the girl at the school, exchanged phone numbers, then hooked up later. Which the evidence (that we have seen) plainly is not the case.
My view is they were at the school at the same time, but "met" is a bit of a stretch.
Go Dogs
This guy.3rd time - revised code of conduct in 2018/19 off season. Hence Barba punishment
Why don’t come out and say that Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs and all their supporters are rapists. While you’re at it it’s a good idea to also say that everyone that has ever been accused of a crime is a criminal no matter the outcome of a trial, if they were lucky to have one.Just wondering if there are any posters on here moralising on JO and CHN's behaviour (schoolgirls/legal age of consent) BUT YET they find no conflict in supporting Pell and the Catholic Church for systemic paedophilia perpetrators and coverups.
I haven't done a study of posters, but that would seem hypocritical in the extreme to me.
Such nonsense.It depends on your definition of "met", if I get my picture taken with a 100 of so people in a day, maybe or maybe not spoke to half of them, don't recall any of them really, wouldn't recognise them later, is that your definition of "met"? My definition of "met" is a face to face meeting, introduction with an exchange of names, a handshake perhaps. Some people apply even more to the word "met", in this case they are using it as a substitute for "chatted up". Such as Okunbor "chatted up" the girl at the school, exchanged phone numbers, then hooked up later. Which the evidence (that we have seen) plainly is not the case.
My view is they were at the school at the same time, but "met" is a bit of a stretch.
Go Dogs
Funny how you say such nonsense then end up proving what TwinTurbo is sayingSuch nonsense.
JO met her at the school. They did not exchange phone numbers. If you saw the posts (they were posted by someone) the girl contacted him via social media and sent JO a photo taken at the school. JO asked who she was and she pointed herself out in the photo. He knew they had met (however briefly) at school on a "Bulldogs related" visit. They arranged to hook up. The rest is history.
In the text message exchange, which has been published, Okunbor clearly mentions the school and confirms that she was there, so whether they “met” or not, he clearly knew where she was from when he agreed to meet her.It depends on your definition of "met", if I get my picture taken with a 100 of so people in a day, maybe or maybe not spoke to half of them, don't recall any of them really, wouldn't recognise them later, is that your definition of "met"? My definition of "met" is a face to face meeting, introduction with an exchange of names, a handshake perhaps. Some people apply even more to the word "met", in this case they are using it as a substitute for "chatted up". Such as Okunbor "chatted up" the girl at the school, exchanged phone numbers, then hooked up later. Which the evidence (that we have seen) plainly is not the case.
My view is they were at the school at the same time, but "met" is a bit of a stretch.
Go Dogs
There have been studies that concludes humans when passing judgement fall into these 2 categories,Some posters on this thread make themselves out to be saints.
for the record I am 42 and would have no problem banging a hot school girl.
Time & time again this happens.If the game won’t tolerate such conduct from players, why then would they ever be allowed to play In this code again? yet we all know they will be signed by other clubs an they will be back playing nrl again, if it doesn’t die of corse .!!
it was very silly behaviour, by both. But sacking, de registration.. not convinced it will hold up.