I could honestly see the points you were trying to make before, but now you've really lost me. Yes, people should hold judgment until they know all the facts so I understand what you're trying to say there. By labelling someone without having the facts in front of you, it can be dangerous as to wrongly label someone is potentially life changing. Agree with you there. Maybe it would've been best for me to allow you "nothing illegal done / nothing to see here" brigade to prance about, but my way of thinking is that it's doing the situation injustice not to speak up about how I feel and see the matter. So I did.
But who's talking about him being a predator of children? Man. You do like making shit up. It's Child Supervision Guidelines 101 dude.
- Don't be alone with any child.
- Don't talk about anything sexual.
- Don't touch the child in an inappropriate matter.
- Don't connect with child via social media.
- Don't ever be alone with a child in a room.
- Report any incidences immediately.
He went against all of these things and more. No one is or has labelled him as a child predator as far as I know. She's old enough to have sex. She didn't complain. Her parents didn't complain. What's so hard to understand about that? The sex part is legal and no one here is debating that.
However ... that doesn't mean he failed in his duty to perform his duties of 'supervising' the child. And whichever way you put it he did. Is that breaking the law? If he were a teacher, or teacher's assistant etc. he'd 100% be breaking the law. The only difference in this case is that he's employed by the NRL and Bulldogs, and by acting so quickly the Dogs have managed to get the parents / child to be sweet with it all and to take on responsibility to act. Well done Bulldogs.
Now. You're the first person who's even connected Okunbor to being a predator of children. Is it possibly you who is slandering the player?