What are you on about mate, I'm not disputing thier actions being inappropriate or distasteful. I agree with them being punished however he has claimed that it's to do with working with children and it's clearly not. In one of his post He wanted to be informed how it couldn't be that reason. So basically he claimed that JO and CHN committed a crime then he changed to say its a workplace issue relating to that misconduct.
I returned fire after he started to ridicule my view as someone who is agitated and have an agenda amongst other insinuations.
I don't need to but I'll add that I'm a father of 3 girls with a 15yo in high school, so if you think that holds any significance to allow me to comment on this subject, which it doesn't.
I think it's the whole 'slander' thing is petty personally which I think is a poor approach to getting your view across.
Maybe you're getting mixed up between him and me as numerous times I brought up that I thought he had commited a crime when connected to child supervision? Don't know, but I do remember him pointing out repeatedly that no crime had been commited whereas I was the one talking about child supervision laws.
Look. My question is this. If the parents and/or female involved had complained would the police have pressed charges? Or at least investigated further? I imagine yes. In that case the only reason he hasn't done anything illegal is only because no formal complaint was made, but it doesn't take away from the fact it was against the law. Get what I'm saying.?
I'll give you an example. Last year an employee at a camp I know went against the child supervision guidelines that are implemented on camp to the point that one of the parents had to be notified and a child was sent home. The employee was immediately let go based on what happened so no formal complaint was made by the parents. On the surface the employee hadn't done anything illegal, and because the camp acted immediately and dealt with it immediately it never got to public light.
However, that doesn't mean that there weren't grounds for the state, police etc. to press charges had they known the full extent of what happened. In reality, had the cmap chosen to take the step to report this employee then he/she would've potentially been facing charges as would've the camp itself.
The argument you're presenting is based purely on the fact nothing illegal has occurred which is based entirely on the fact no complaints were made. However, had there been one then the case would've been entirely different. No?