And the Roosters spin team is in full swing again... “The Roosters have stated they will not go to market to find a replacement” what a load of shite! Xerri and JAC anyone lol
emphasis on ''and''
If they sign JAC, I will literally chuck a shit on the doorstep to their office.
And here I thought you were only going to expose us.
IMO, bad luck Billy but suck shit Rorters
How am I suppose to expose you when the NRL will change the rules to suit their darlings, aka Broncos, Storm, Roosters, Rabbits?
Your point is wrong as you're comparing apples and rocks. Your club has received the maximum it can under the rules where a player is injured during a rep game - https://www.nrl.com/news/2018/05/22...eive-salary-cap-relief-for-injured-rep-stars/
Can you honestly tell me those rules aren't rorted? If a player is injured for the majority of the season, that contract in full should be taken out for salary cap relief. How on earth is a club supposed to put themselves in a competitive position otherwise?
Of course the scabs rorted the rule as they convinced the NRL Sam's bung shoulder was the result of some infection and not the two reconstructions it had done to it. And before you ask, yes, that rule will be rorted by every single club in the comp including yours.
I agree if a player is injured during a rep game, regardless of the duration of the injury, the club should have that amount taken off their cap. Do you think that rule won't be rorted as well?
How exactly has my club rorted this rule?
The rule certainly isn't being rorted by my club... Keiran Foran, case in point.
Do it, but don't tell blue balls, he might get turned on and post a thread about it
I said 'will' rort it.
I didn't say it was. But if given the circumstances where it could, I'm sure your club would take advantage of the rule.
Really? Like the NRL will let them rort it. They've already defined $350,000 and won't change it.
Hey, the problem is the NRL adjust the rules to allow their darling clubs to benefit from it. If other clubs fall into the same criteria within those rules, sure they'd do the same thing, but as it stands, my club is not doing anything wrong, and they certainly are not twisting the NRL's arm to make any changes to suit them.
Again you are comparing apples to rocks. The NRL allowed the scabs to medically retire Burgess on dubious grounds. But that has not disadvantaged your club with regards to Foran as he was injured in a rep game and the NRL are applying the rules AND reimbursing your club the maximum amount possible under the rule.
Are you saying that if the circumstances appeared where your club could medically retire Foran on dubious grounds that they wouldn't take advantage of that?
