Are you suggesting this is flawed science??? such a thing does not exist surely?Two problems with that:
1) you're using the 2nd law of thermodynamics with an equation based on a solid object to explain the thermal dynamics of gases. As humans found out a long time ago, this doesn't work
https://history.aip.org/climate/Radmath.htm
2) the first equation doesn't work when you are accounting for a continuous line of heat from multiple heat sources. The sun heats the earth. The earth transfers heat to the atmosphere in including the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at the lowest point first. The greenhouse gases that have absorbs the heat then emit the heat to the place of lowest heat which is other parts of the atmosphere and other CO2. When the sun stops heating the earth, the earth becomes a lower heat source. Much of the heat ends up transferred off to space. If this didn't happen then we'd cook to death. Add more CO2 and the heat will transfer to the CO2 first. Not due to it being the lowest heat source as it's not. Due to it being the closest thing that is lower in heat. Adding more CO2 slows down the ability of the IR heat to leave the earth
Hacky is that one guy who likes to disagree sometimes for the sake of disagreeing.Are you suggesting this is flawed science??? such a thing does not exist surely?
This. And let's just say (for arguments sake) that the Government either actioned what these pricks were saying or did whatever it is they need to do in order to get them to STFU, they will, without doubt, find something else to whinge about.The Friday protests were entirely pointless and even on the measure of protester numbers weren't very impressive. They had far more people at one of these climate protests a few months ago.
The whole protest 'strategy' has been pathetic because they've now protested so often that no one even bothers paying attention to their messaging anymore.
I work in the city and there has been at least 6-7 climate protests in the last few months alone.
The protests achieve nothing except some mild inconvenience for hard working folks leaving their office and trying to get home.
Yeah well don't be sayin that cos they'll step it up for more attention and it'll be your fault cos they read it here.Also, now that a few days have gone by, is anyone (in any meaningful way) even talking about this protest anymore? No.
Has anything changed because of the protest? No.
Other way around. All science is flawed 'cause it can't explain life, the Universe and everything.Are you suggesting this is flawed science??? such a thing does not exist surely?
... and will anything change about this protest? No.Also, now that a few days have gone by, is anyone (in any meaningful way) even talking about this protest anymore? No.
Has anything changed because of the protest? No.
Hacky is that one guy who likes to disagree sometimes for the sake of disagreeing.
he is going to have to read this post and then reply to me disagreeing and prove my point!
The Friday protests were entirely pointless and even on the measure of protester numbers weren't very impressive. They had far more people at one of these climate protests a few months ago.
The whole protest 'strategy' has been pathetic because they've now protested so often that no one even bothers paying attention to their messaging anymore.
I work in the city and there has been at least 6-7 climate protests in the last few months alone.
The protests achieve nothing except some mild inconvenience for hard working folks leaving their office and trying to get home.
still waiting for hacky to reply to my post in protestyea... but... but SCIENCE
I agreeHacky is that one guy who likes to disagree sometimes for the sake of disagreeing.
he is going to have to read this post and then reply to me disagreeing and prove my point!
I think he's waiting to have his reply peer reviewedstill waiting for hacky to reply to my post in protest
When you get to my level of awesomeness, you have no peers.I think he's waiting to have his reply peer reviewed
Technically thats a disagreement.I agree
I concurTechnically thats a disagreement.
Like how saying it is what it is, means the same thing as it isn't what it isn't.