I don't gamble but ages back I joined this sports betting fb page out of curiosity. The guys in there have been talking about being banned from sites for years. They all seem to do it if you win too much. I liked seeing that as it made wanting to bet even less enticing and anyone who you know who says they use those sites must not do very well considering they are not limited.
Wow, its almost as if gambling companies were for-profit. (Sorry, couldn't resist)
your comment proves that you are an idiot.
So you're spreadsheets are more clever than their mathematical algorithms designed by mathematicians to identify those that win more than they lose? You should publish and on-sell your methodology as you'd make far more than 15K in 3 years.
When you're dealing with multiple agencies and using them against eachother, those algorithms go out the window.
Really? So when there's more money in your accounts than there was before those algorithms can't count that?
Total amount spent: not every dollar spent on gambling is lost – that’s the whole risk-reward appeal. The same report tallied our national gambling losses at just under $24 billion. Per person that’s more than $1,250 lost to gambling every year. We can break these losses down into:
It is not about that. They just only want people betting who are dumb. The guys who do it seriously seem to bet live, and bet big. When these guys win they get banned from betting live and have to call up to place bets which takes too long and takes away the point of being a member for them. Or they just limit their max bet to like $100.
It's got to a point where it shouldn't be considered gambling as that implies you have a chance to win. It's like when people, really dumb people, say they "play" the pokies. There is no play, they are machine designed to take money from you and the longer you play them the more you loose.
