- Joined
- May 15, 2017
- Messages
- 22,980
- Reaction score
- 42,403
Well publicised ad infinitum on here.I doubt it mate
Please do tel about the cons
Does it really need repeating?
Well publicised ad infinitum on here.I doubt it mate
Please do tel about the cons
People reckon he's a future five-eighth. I have my reservations about that. He set the world on fire in 2018-19 playing centre. By the way in 2018 he was awesome. He was great in 2019 as well but not as good.He’s not worth more than the $800 grand he already knocked back, so why would we bother.
Maybe some players don’t want to come?Good post on another thread by Finchie
Just a quick run down
Highlight: dwz signing
players targeted and missed out:
Reece Robson
Jake Turpin
Luciano Leilua
Sam walker
Jayden brailey
Api korisau
Herman essese
Jessie ramien
Tommy Turbo
Jake turbo
Patrick cardigan
James segyaro
Corey Oates
that’s my concern
Can’t seal the deal and the question must be asked why ???
Seriously!!! Enough already
Let it goI requested someone else to do this but it hasn't happened so here goes and I hope I'm doing this correctly.
Assuming Andrew Hill was telling the truth when he said the Dogs wouldn't be making an official offer to Mitchell do you believe yes or no the club should have made some kind of "official" offer ?.
A previous poll on here asked if we should have offered a "10 year" contract. Although I wanted the club to pursue Mitchell personally I voted no in that one simply because I didn't think we should offer ANYONE a decade long contact (too much risk if seriously injured etc) but for 3 to-5 years max then yes for me
For every post I read on here from fans wanting the club to sign Mitchell there's another one saying he is a waste of space so here's your chance to see what the majority think. No stipulation on price or length - just do you believe the club should have put in some kind of offer ?
If this poll gets a decent number of votes and the YES votes win as I suspect can someone (else) please send it to the club PLEASE. You never know they might be slightly interested in what a few hundred fans / members think :O)
No need to whinge or comment about this. Just please vote one way or the other.
Should we make an offer to Mitchell......................YesI requested someone else to do this but it hasn't happened so here goes and I hope I'm doing this correctly.
Assuming Andrew Hill was telling the truth when he said the Dogs wouldn't be making an official offer to Mitchell do you believe yes or no the club should have made some kind of "official" offer ?.
A previous poll on here asked if we should have offered a "10 year" contract. Although I wanted the club to pursue Mitchell personally I voted no in that one simply because I didn't think we should offer ANYONE a decade long contact (too much risk if seriously injured etc) but for 3 to-5 years max then yes for me
For every post I read on here from fans wanting the club to sign Mitchell there's another one saying he is a waste of space so here's your chance to see what the majority think. No stipulation on price or length - just do you believe the club should have put in some kind of offer ?
If this poll gets a decent number of votes and the YES votes win as I suspect can someone (else) please send it to the club PLEASE. You never know they might be slightly interested in what a few hundred fans / members think :O)
No need to whinge or comment about this. Just please vote one way or the other.
Should we make an offer to Mitchell......................Yes
Should we make a $1 000 000 offer to Mitchell?........................No
He has the talent to become an immortal and the mental head space to be Jamal Idris.
Too much of a risk at top $$$$$
Don’t think I would.Would you sign him at 800 with another 200 tpa?
Don’t think I would.
1) Dogs don’t have great TPA history - so $200k is a big ask.
2) Even at $800k it’s massive coin to assume you can extract the same performance. At the Chooks he had Keary and Cordner on his side. We have relatively in-experienced halves who whilst I believe deserve their chance, probably can’t (yet) create the same space for Mitchell.
3) Too much other smoke with managers and advisors - distractions you don’t need as we still have other work to do to rebuild the team and business.
The kid can obviously play - no-one disputes that. But the ROI for me - given all the circumstances - simply doesn’t stack up - which has been my consistent position.
Thankfully we didn’t hear a peep out of mad Monday this year and none of our players have been in Kerobokan or Parklea prisonsLike someone very logically said on here recently... why does keary or cordner need to be responsible for latrells highlight reel.
The kid smokes the opposition on his own.
If you want to talk about ROI.
Let's talk about Elliott, and his efforts on mad Monday.....how's our ROI with him. Sponsors walked, plus we are struggling now to nail one
In fact management and the board need to look in their own backyard in respect to ROI.
Their major phuck up was indeed mad Monday and not putting better systems in place For this ridiculous carry on that occurred ..
Tell me they are not going to blame the previous board for this
No defence of Mad Monday - utter shambles.Like someone very logically said on here recently... why does keary or cordner need to be responsible for latrells highlight reel.
The kid smokes the opposition on his own.
If you want to talk about ROI.
Let's talk about Elliott, and his efforts on mad Monday.....how's our ROI with him. Sponsors walked, plus we are struggling now to nail one
In fact management and the board need to look in their own backyard in respect to ROI.
Their major phuck up was indeed mad Monday and not putting better systems in place For this ridiculous carry on that occurred ..
Tell me they are not going to blame the previous board for this
TPA are supposed to be outside the cap so whatever they are they are.Would you sign him at 800 with another 200 tpa?