Tassie Devil
Kennel Immortal
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2018
- Messages
- 17,184
- Reaction score
- 15,004
Without ruffling a few feathers here I think a lot of you are missing the point .... or maybe I didn't communicate myself properly?
I'm not saying Pay is good or bad. For the record, I was positively surprised by him at the backend of the season. He deserves credit for unifying the squad. Bringing us together. There does seem like a real bond amongst the squad. And the recent mass re-signings point to them being happy and believing in his vision.
I just don't know why he's been exempt from all of the discussions recently. For some time we debated about whether he was / is the right man to lead us forward. Many were up in arms about Holbrook not coming to us. But as soon as the push for new players began ... nothing ... Why?
If we're going to truly discuss our apparent 'bad' recruitment then let's discuss everything rather than using our own agendas to push against management. Why's no one talking about Pay? Now, I'm not saying he's good or bad. I'm just questioning why the shift?
The coach is what the team is built around. You can have superstars but a bad coach ... A coach with a vision. A certain style of play. A charisma. This coach draws players in. They want to play for him.
Why aren't players doing that with Pay? You talk about money all the time, and that's important. But at the same time the players still want to play for a coach they can believe in. Are the lack of signings showing us that they don't have that belief in him?
I'm not saying Pay is good or bad. For the record, I was positively surprised by him at the backend of the season. He deserves credit for unifying the squad. Bringing us together. There does seem like a real bond amongst the squad. And the recent mass re-signings point to them being happy and believing in his vision.
I just don't know why he's been exempt from all of the discussions recently. For some time we debated about whether he was / is the right man to lead us forward. Many were up in arms about Holbrook not coming to us. But as soon as the push for new players began ... nothing ... Why?
If we're going to truly discuss our apparent 'bad' recruitment then let's discuss everything rather than using our own agendas to push against management. Why's no one talking about Pay? Now, I'm not saying he's good or bad. I'm just questioning why the shift?
The coach is what the team is built around. You can have superstars but a bad coach ... A coach with a vision. A certain style of play. A charisma. This coach draws players in. They want to play for him.
Why aren't players doing that with Pay? You talk about money all the time, and that's important. But at the same time the players still want to play for a coach they can believe in. Are the lack of signings showing us that they don't have that belief in him?