Wow, thats rough.Who do we think is more injury prone, Koroisau or Liddle?
@Nexus How's you head after this one?I agree.they should focus on api.we desperately need a Hooker.ramien I’m not fussed.ese’ese we don’t need we have some young guys coming through.api would give our attack much more direction.we need to shift some deadwood.fualolo.lichaa.holland.thats got to be 800k worth just there.i would be disappointed if the powers to be don’t address our hooking position as it’s been a weakness for too long.
Oh man, why would you do that to me? Do you hate me or something?@Nexus How's you head after this one?
Fuk & Fkn Yuk!!LOL - Fridays here and everyone is just making up anything to get some clicks today...
View attachment 11021
View attachment 11022
No Levi, No Lichaa.I'll be so upset if we sign Levi. Surely we just stick with JMK and go all in for Harry Grant. Even if we have to resign Lichaa for 1 more year, I'd rather that then being stuck with Levi for 2-3 years.
These guys aren't the guys you pay overs for. Api is good but he isn't going to get a run next year at manly so why pay overs. It's us or off to the most under achieving club nz. Ramien is a head case and when players at another club ban him from playing that says it all. He is going to be trouble. Sharks want him, let's offer xeri or the saints kid overs and force their hand.Its Where we are at the moment .. if we dont offer overs - I cant see us signing very good NRL standard players..
Agree mateI'll be so upset if we sign Levi. Surely we just stick with JMK and go all in for Harry Grant. Even if we have to resign Lichaa for 1 more year, I'd rather that then being stuck with Levi for 2-3 years.
It's not that easy Jackson isn't worth getting into bidding war with now.Agree mate
If we can’t sign a decent hooker I’d rather stick with Marshall king till we do.
Lichaa has to go or play Canterbury cup on min wage
We better not lose Jackson
Guck I’d be pissed at the club if that happens
If Jackson goes it shows the club isn’t going forward anytime soon
Otherwise Jackson would stay to enjoy the good years to come.
Sharks are on a downward spiral
Surely Jackson wouldn’t go there at this stage of his career and the fact the sharks are beginning their own rebuilding stage
It shouldn’t matterIt's not that easy Jackson it isn't worth getting into bidding war with now.
He signed his last contract as a origin and test player and now he doesn't even get mentioned as a selection.
He will have to take a haircut if he wants to stay.
I think our opinions on his leadership vary quite a bit.It shouldn’t matter
Other clubs will now sign him as a non rep player also so will have to also pay under what he is currently on or pay overs.
And for our club, it’s not about signing him for his ability to play rep footy
It’s to sign him for his leadership
His attitude on and off the field
The example he sets and the standards he sets
The legacy he can create when he retires a one club man
The influence he can have on our future players as a part of our club in retirement after his playing days as a club legend and one club player
Like lamb despite his rookie years at the magpies
He is a bulldog legend
He was once signed as an origin and test player
Then he kept getting contracts once he was no longer a rep player
Jackson offers value to our club he can not offer to another club
We need to keep him
Has his game dropped off?I think our opinions on his leadership vary quite a bit.
Comparing him to Lamb is a huge stretch.
Baa was kept around because he was still dragging his team to victories and premierships on one leg at the end of his career.
I was using his non rep selection as a barometer on how much his game has dropped off.
Would i like to keep him? Of course but let's be honest his form has been on a down ward spiral for the last 2-3 years.
If the Sharks or someone else offer him a bigger deal I wouldn't match it.
Jackson getting over looked at rep level is more about the crazy depth in the backrowI think our opinions on his leadership vary quite a bit.
Comparing him to Lamb is a huge stretch.
Baa was kept around because he was still dragging his team to victories and premierships on one leg at the end of his career.
I was using his non rep selection as a barometer on how much his game has dropped off.
Would i like to keep him? Of course but let's be honest his form has been on a down ward spiral for the last 2-3 years.
If the Sharks or someone else offer him a bigger deal I wouldn't match it.
His game has dropped off the face of the earth!Has his game dropped off?
I haven’t really seen it drop off
He won’t win you games like baa did, baa was chief playmaker
When I speak leadership I’m not talking winning games
The cover tackle he made the desire
But more importantly his attitude and sportsmanship demonstrated when the tigers missed that kick
That’s an example we saw
There are other examples we don’t see day in day out on and off the field
And Jackson’s football is still up with some of the best and he is still good enough for rep footy
He is a must to keep in the squad in my opinion.
I’d meet you in the middleHis game has dropped off the face of the earth!
He's lost all of his ball playing ability, he drops off tackles at a alarming rate now too and he doesn't run lines.
I just can't agree at all that his football is still up with some of the best he is a solid NRL player now.
Hopefully the club offer him a fair deal around the $500k range and a deal can be done.
No doubt about it,Jackson getting over looked at rep level is more about the crazy depth in the backrow
True but also the fact other back rowers offer the ball playing ability that he doesn’t have.Jackson getting over looked at rep level is more about the crazy depth in the backrow
api does not want to go nzLOL - Fridays here and everyone is just making up anything to get some clicks today...
View attachment 11021
View attachment 11022