B-Train
Kennel Immortal
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Messages
- 32,775
- Reaction score
- 48,945
With another year of Pay as coach essentially confirmed, will he risk losing or stifling the development of young prospects like Wakeham, Ogden, To'omaga, Harper, Kalache etc in favour of his pets like he's done with others?
I can't see how this is healthy. It's frightening that the Andersons don't see a problem with any of this. Pay talks about players needing 50-60 games in FG but the problem is only a handful of his favourites are picked week in week out regardless of how bad they play whereas other players are dropped on a whim every second week...
I worry that going into next season more players will not realise their potential or be given a chance because they'll be alienated by Pays favouritism and blind loyalty to his recruits. It's this kind of nepotism and stubbornness which has and still is debilitating the club and needs to change urgently.
I can't see how this is healthy. It's frightening that the Andersons don't see a problem with any of this. Pay talks about players needing 50-60 games in FG but the problem is only a handful of his favourites are picked week in week out regardless of how bad they play whereas other players are dropped on a whim every second week...
I worry that going into next season more players will not realise their potential or be given a chance because they'll be alienated by Pays favouritism and blind loyalty to his recruits. It's this kind of nepotism and stubbornness which has and still is debilitating the club and needs to change urgently.
Last edited: