Opinion Manu and McCullough?

Smirrors

Smirrors

Kennel Participant
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
250
Reaction score
63
Dogs Of War said:
McCullough has a 2 year option in his favour at the Bronco's. Can't see him leaving. And thats good for us, as I'd rather get Turpin.
Click to expand...
McCullough is as one dimensional as they get. Not the type of hooker you need these days. That said he offers stability and defence which may be ok for 1 or 2 seasons.
 
J

jpneves

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
1,392
Reaction score
823
We need a hooker who can trouble the defence not another who just makes 40 tackles and is slow from dummy half
 
Raysie

Raysie

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
7,994
Reaction score
6,656
jpneves said:
We need a hooker who can trouble the defence not another who just makes 40 tackles and is slow from dummy half
Click to expand...
I'd be fine with one that could pass left and right as a start. Anything else is a bonus.
 
bradyk

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,916
Reaction score
19,181
Manu might not be worth 750k, but if you want to get him away from the Roosters you have to offer money like that.. if he's worth 500k then Roosters will pay what he's worth and why would he leave Roosters for Bulldogs for the same amount of $..

Just on McCullough, he's at the end of his career and offers nothing, no spark, out of dummy half (okay he can defend..). The attack starts from dummy half so can't be one dimensional anymore from that position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top