Blueandwhiteblood1968
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 2,949
- Reaction score
- 2,030
Maybe he was going to court to complain about that shit big red Kia logo that ruins every piece of Bulldogs supporters gear.
That doesn’t mean his clothing choice or preferred footy team should be the major focus of the headline and major focus of the article. This is a perfect example of gutter journalism which is intended to perpetuate negative stereotypes.Its not the usual clothing people wear ro court..
What the blokes wearing isn't the problem... look at the headline, then the secondary headline, and then the piece in the article.Whats the big deal? The reporter mentioned the guy wore a Dogs singlet?... Its not the usual clothing people wear ro court..
Well he's from Victoria so either Storm or AFL fanboy.What a great article. Stating the obvious duh........wearing a bulldogs singlet...so what???
I now want to know what sort of underwear he had on, what toilet paper he uses, whether or not he watches Neighbours and what his favourite colour is because like the stupid comment regarding his apparel it is oh so relevant to the story.
The reporter has certainly got people talking about the article and has very cleverly made sure that main focus of attention is all about what footy team he supports....typical gutter trash reporting..
I read many things... for serious news I read other stuff.Why @Mr Invisible do you read this website.
Agreed ,fuckwit is right the prick has probably never kicked a football in his life ,fuckin inbred, and he wears our jersey what a knob !!!This fuckwit could have done the club a favour and not worn a Bulldog singlet to court.
Ummm that's not the same bloke... no cheek tats!
Don’t shoot the messenger. Found it online. Reminded me of that bloke who used to be at all doggies games in a dogs jersey and then on the footy show each week in a parra jerseyUmmm that's not the same bloke... no cheek tats!
I take your point.. Media always ready to trash our club.. Club needs to get on frontfoot when they do..Well well well .... seems the message was heard loud and clear.
Today another article on this mentally ill lad, but note the difference.
View attachment 9865
View attachment 9866
View attachment 9867
That's how it should have been reported (if anything) in the first place. Not making Bulldogs the focus of the headline.
Seems he's as unhinged as that Raymond bloke.. searching for the spotlight where-ever possible.
It is clearly an older photo of the same guy (in the eels top)Ummm that's not the same bloke... no cheek tats!
I was there for that Streak. The only excitement in the game !!