- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
- Messages
- 17,736
- Reaction score
- 31,795
Swap Elliot out for Tualau and the bench looks instantly better.
Is this the madness he was referring to? Pick a fkd up 17 that makes no rhyme or reason to confuse the opposition lolThis has to be a joke? That just can't be the 17 ffs. I'm so fucking puzzled right now, the only thing that will make me more puzzled is if that 17 runs out and actually wins haha.
BrInG tHe MaDnEsSIs this the madness he was referring to? Pick a fkd up 17 that makes no rhyme or reason to confuse the opposition lol
Tolman at lock is a good idea and he can play 80 mins. We need size on the benchTolman at 13 not the worst thing in the world but not the greatest.
I’m still not convinced with the make up of our bench but man we due a win
You are a brave man to say that. After what have been said here in the last hourT
Tolman at lock is a good idea and he can play 80 mins. We need size on the bench
The excuse is that Pay doesn't have a clue as to what he actually wants to do.Tolman at lock ???? I couldn’t understand Klemmer being selected there & im even more perplexed with Tolman.
I suppose the excuse that the lock forward is now a middle forward will be the reasoning.
I suspect that Dean Pay wants to plug up the fragile middle which has been leaking points.
The depth must be of grave concern.
Dont think he does either mateAbsolutely no clue, i have no idea what Pay is thinking.
sorry folks, seems i'll need to have a word with my postman.i had heard it would probably be at the expense of elliott, so perhaps elliott back to the bench ? just guessing on that front, but good mail on martin making the 17 this week.
In what universe is it a good idea? He couldn't make an impact off the bench but he will make an impact starting? Really? Please explain.T
Tolman at lock is a good idea and he can play 80 mins. We need size on the bench
Lol **** thinks just saying “dogs of war” will turn the players into men.The excuse is that Pay doesn't have a clue as to what he actually wants to do.
I agree. Say what you want about Tolman but he should really bolster our defense which has been atrocious. I don't see a problem having him play 80 or close too it and just be a tackling machine. I just don't want him taking settlers and getting in the way in attacking situations.Lots of criticism of Dean Pay. But lets get real. The players some are suggesting should be starters are probably worse than Tolman.
I’m not happy either as you know but he is there solely to tighten our defence up.This has to be a joke? That just can't be the 17 ffs. I'm so fucking puzzled right now, the only thing that will make me more puzzled is if that 17 runs out and actually wins haha.
That's it isn't it. You have Tolman and Lichaa in the middle for the entire/most of the game. You have the two props on rotation to give you punch up the middle and keep things tight. Hopefully they will pop a couple of offloads and Mbye, Lichaa and now JMK will be there to support them. You have two wide running backrowers who should also go all game. So, unless we get smashed with HIAs and or injuries 7/8 interchanges will likely affect the props and bench with Lichaa prob coming off late in the game so Brown can get a run. Then again given Brown's experience he may be tempted to interchange him and Lichaa back and forth during the game. If that is the likely scenario then you would have to think that Tualau, Fualolo, fine and Brown are the bench. Keeps impact rolling when the first string props go off and a bit of speed and size with Fine.I agree. Say what you want about Tolman but he should really bolster our defense which has been atrocious. I don't see a problem having him play 80 or close too it and just be a tackling machine. I just don't want him taking settlers and getting in the way in attacking situations.
It's an absolutely stupid idea. We're basically handicapping our go forward and his defence isn't anywhere near as good as people make out. Theres only one other player that has played 80 through the middle this season and that's Jake Trbojevic and he and Tolman aren't even in the same universe.I agree. Say what you want about Tolman but he should really bolster our defense which has been atrocious. I don't see a problem having him play 80 or close too it and just be a tackling machine. I just don't want him taking settlers and getting in the way in attacking situations.