Google redefining the Word "Fascism"

[Memberberries]

Hey lads,

Go check out google. Define Fascism.

They have changed it to target the political right.

Fuck this world.

These ***** are trying to change history.

Social Justice Warriors will be the death of humanity

Fucking Greenacre fairies! This is all done to defy their parents and their religion!

 

[Mr 95%]

Fascist bastards changing the definition..hang on a Fascist bastard wouldn't let me say that..A Liberal would though.. Mmm interesting thought..

 

[Realist90]

Fascist bastards changing the definition..hang on a Fascist bastard wouldn't let me say that..A Liberal would though.. Mmm interesting thought..

A liberal will let you say anything that's not of their agenda. But say something against, trannies, gays, blacks, females, gender pay gap myth, facts on differences with sex, facts in general, and they in turn become fascists themselves.

This new age liberalism isn't freedom of speech don't get it confused.

 

[Mr 95%]

A liberal will let you say anything that's not of their agenda. But say something against, trannies, gays, blacks, females, gender pay gap myth, facts on differences with sex, facts in general, and they in turn become fascists themselves.

This new age liberalism isn't freedom of speech don't get it confused.

See thats the key isn't it..the new age.. definitions change throughout history..and the concept of Nazism and Fascism as a leftist ideology is completely ridiculous ..see the ideology they implemented is not simply reflected by their economic systems but also by its social agenda ..You see the idea of liberalism as a concept is..in essence..the belief in expressing ones views..and encouraging people to live their lives without fear of scorn..in other words.. be seen as equals even though they have differences..that is black, disabled, gay, woman or man....provided it does not impinge on the rights of others..

Does that sound like Nazism or Fascism? Granted the 'new age liberalism' does go too far in many aspects..but to confuse it with a right wing agenda is ludicrous..because at the very heart of liberalism is the freedom of expression of ones true beliefs without the threat of oppression..and THAT is a concept that is completely foreign to Fascism and Nazism..thats were the real confusion lies..

 

[Realist90]

See thats the key isn't it..the new age.. definitions change throughout history..and the concept of Nazism and Fascism as a leftist ideology is completely ridiculous ..see the ideology they implemented is not simply reflected by their economic systems but also by its social agenda ..You see the idea of liberalism as a concept is..in essence..the belief in expressing ones views..and encouraging people to live their lives without fear of scorn..in other words.. be seen as equals even though they have differences..that is black, disabled, gay, woman or man....provided it does not impinge on the rights of others..

Does that sound like Nazism or Fascism? Granted the 'new age liberalism' does go too far in many aspects..but to confuse it with a right wing agenda is ludicrous..because at the very heart of liberalism is the freedom of expression of ones true beliefs without the threat of oppression..and THAT is a concept that is completely foreign to Fascism and Nazism..thats were the real confusion lies..

To me this new age liberalism is a form of fascism due to how the left don't allow certain things to be said, facts altered, facts not shown etc because it would go against their agenda. They will scrutinise you if you talk againsta female and label you a sexist and mysoginist, say you're not for gay marriage then you're labelled intolerant and evil so on so fourth. Essentially the left uses political correctness as a weapon in making people not speak truths in fear of retaliation from the left. That is essentially how the nazis rolled, how the soviets rolled, speak against them, publish any truths about them and you'd be fkd. The left doesn't give a fuk if the person is gay if the person is a female etc they use that to manipulate people into thinking they care about human rights and all that but really what they're focused on is trying to control what can and can't be said. If they really cared about strong women and opresseion against women why then would they scrutinise a female who doesn't agree with the lefty feminists, why would they scrutinise a gay who doesn't agree with the lefty gays? It's simple, they do not care they care about causing division and make it out like they're caring but really they don't.

 

[Mr 95%]

To me this new age liberalism is a form of fascism due to how the left don't allow certain things to be said, facts altered, facts not shown etc because it would go against their agenda. They will scrutinise you if you talk againsta female and label you a sexist and mysoginist, say you're not for gay marriage then you're labelled intolerant and evil so on so fourth. Essentially the left uses political correctness as a weapon in making people not speak truths in fear of retaliation from the left. That is essentially how the nazis rolled, how the soviets rolled, speak against them, publish any truths about them and you'd be fkd. The left doesn't give a fuk if the person is gay if the person is a female etc they use that to manipulate people into thinking they care about human rights and all that but really what they're focused on is trying to control what can and can't be said. If they really cared about strong women and opresseion against women why then would they scrutinise a female who doesn't agree with the lefty feminists, why would they scrutinise a gay who doesn't agree with the lefty gays? It's simple, they do not care they care about causing division and make it out like they're caring but really they don't.

Well guess what? This definition of 'Liberalism' is not Left..it leans to the right.. However it does not alter the definition of Fascism nor Nazism..which leans towards the right of the political spectrum..

 

[Hacky McAxe]

To me this new age liberalism is a form of fascism due to how the left don't allow certain things to be said, facts altered, facts not shown etc because it would go against their agenda. They will scrutinise you if you talk againsta female and label you a sexist and mysoginist, say you're not for gay marriage then you're labelled intolerant and evil so on so fourth. Essentially the left uses political correctness as a weapon in making people not speak truths in fear of retaliation from the left. That is essentially how the nazis rolled, how the soviets rolled, speak against them, publish any truths about them and you'd be fkd. The left doesn't give a fuk if the person is gay if the person is a female etc they use that to manipulate people into thinking they care about human rights and all that but really what they're focused on is trying to control what can and can't be said. If they really cared about strong women and opresseion against women why then would they scrutinise a female who doesn't agree with the lefty feminists, why would they scrutinise a gay who doesn't agree with the lefty gays? It's simple, they do not care they care about causing division and make it out like they're caring but really they don't.

There's a funny thing with Liberalism. It was always flawed from the start.

Liberalism is a movement based on freedom and equality. Over time this became a problem. How can you allow freedom of speech while also providing protections for minorities?

This lead to two different types of Liberalism. The American left wing Liberalism which demands equal rights but bans free speech on certain things. Demands truth but blocks the truth they don't agree with.

Then there's the right wing Liberalism. More freedom, less protection. Gay marriage, guns, drugs, hookers, everything. People are free to verbally abuse each other because it's free. But violence is not freedom so that's still restricted.

Then you have the Australian Liberals (LNP) who ignore all of that and just call themselves Liberal for the sake of tradition.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

But none of it is about truth. No one accepts the truth if it doesn't support their belief.

 

[Realist90]

There's a funny thing with Liberalism. It was always flawed from the start.

Liberalism is a movement based on freedom and equality. Over time this became a problem. How can you allow freedom of speech while also providing protections for minorities?

This lead to two different types of Liberalism. The American left wing Liberalism which demands equal rights but bans free speech on certain things. Demands truth but blocks the truth they don't agree with.

Then there's the right wing Liberalism. More freedom, less protection. Gay marriage, guns, drugs, hookers, everything. People are free to verbally abuse each other because it's free. But violence is not freedom so that's still restricted.

Then you have the Australian Liberals (LNP) who ignore all of that and just call themselves Liberal for the sake of tradition.

Another good write up. This is why I call pc brigaiders hypocritescoz their agenda is just that. Hypocritical.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Another good write up. This is why I call pc brigaiders hypocritescoz their agenda is just that. Hypocritical.

While I don't entirely agree with this meme, it is somewhat accurate. There are a number of left wing progressives who support the beliefs that only white people can be racist and that white people should be oppressed. It is a little hypocritical.

 

[Realist90]

While I don't entirely agree with this meme, it is somewhat accurate. There are a number of left wing progressives who support the beliefs that only white people can be racist and that white people should be oppressed. It is a little hypocritical.

The second scenario in the 'normal green zone' would have pc brigadiers and feminist calling for his sexist head. To them the norm for that scenario would be this. 'I employ more females than males because they're females.

 

[DoggiesBoy]

The second scenario in the 'normal green zone' would have pc brigadiers and feminist calling for his sexist head. To them the norm for that scenario would be this. 'I employ more females than males because they're females.

that is exactly why those 'pc brigadiers and feminist' people wouldn't be in the normal green zone lol . My goodness you type rubbish to push your agenda.

 

[Realist90]

that is exactly why those 'pc brigadiers and feminist' people wouldn't be in the normal green zone lol . My goodness you type rubbish to push your agenda.

lol great, great pick up. Fkn doesn't take a lot for you pc peeps to get triggered aye. Read prior posts here between me and hacky and mr 95% where I'm talking in a serious manner instead of latching onto a post where I'm just stating the obvious lol.

 

[FreshSoulL]

While I don't entirely agree with this meme, it is somewhat accurate. There are a number of left wing progressives who support the beliefs that only white people can be racist and that white people should be oppressed. It is a little hypocritical.

This meme is very accurate lol

 

[Mr 95%]

There's a funny thing with Liberalism. It was always flawed from the start.

Liberalism is a movement based on freedom and equality. Over time this became a problem. How can you allow freedom of speech while also providing protections for minorities?

This lead to two different types of Liberalism. The American left wing Liberalism which demands equal rights but bans free speech on certain things. Demands truth but blocks the truth they don't agree with.

Then there's the right wing Liberalism. More freedom, less protection. Gay marriage, guns, drugs, hookers, everything. People are free to verbally abuse each other because it's free. But violence is not freedom so that's still restricted.

Then you have the Australian Liberals (LNP) who ignore all of that and just call themselves Liberal for the sake of tradition.

Essentially Hacky 'pure' forms of ideology don't work in reality..there is always some modification..we saw this with Lenin and his socialist regime in Russia after the revolution.. To get the economy functioning he introduced the N.E.P. which was an economic policy with elements of Capitalism..obviously opposed to Socialist doctrine..plus it was run by the bourgeois..ie business class..the very 'class' the revolution was inspired to eliminate.. You can throw Nazism in there too..a modified form of Fascism..and as you point out Liberalism..all in their 'written' form are different to practiice..

So it's pretty rare that a 'real' or 'pure' form of ideology is..as it is written..in practice..but I guess you have to start from somewhere..

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Essentially Hacky 'pure' forms of ideology don't work in reality..there is always some modification..we saw this with Lenin and his socialist regime in Russia after the revolution.. To get the economy functioning he introduced the N.E.P. which was an economic policy with elements of Capitalism..obviously opposed to Socialist doctrine..plus it was run by the bourgeois..ie business class..the very 'class' the revolution was inspired to eliminate.. You can throw Nazism in there too..a modified form of Fascism..and as you point out Liberalism..all in their 'written' form are different to practiice..

So it's pretty rare that a 'real' or 'pure' form of ideology is..as it is written..in practice..but I guess you have to start from somewhere..

Definitely. I have this debate with Libertarian friends all the time. Many of them honestly believe that if you remove most power from the government and privatise everything then it will be a better world. They actually believe that people won't attempt to be greedy and that people will help out the poor so government aid isn't needed.

Pure ideologies never work.

 

[JayBee]

Ben Shapiro.

Enough said.

 

[FreshSoulL]

Ben Shapiro.

Enough said.

He is a sickcunt

 

[JayBee]

He is a sickcunt

He is the sickest of *****.

He went to leftist universites, put up with lefty education system and lecturers.. and graduated with honours.

He calls it how he sees it. I have not seen a video where he does not deconstruct any argument brought against him with logic, and just common sense.

I remember there was one video with a woman stating because she's a woman, men should have no say in abortion. And then he just comes back with... in a time when women are asking for more rights, you want to take away the potential right of a father?

Wrecked.

 

[FreshSoulL]

He is the sickest of *****.

He went to leftist universites, put up with lefty education system and lecturers.. and graduated with honours.

He calls it how he sees it. I have not seen a video where he does not deconstruct any argument brought against him with logic, and just common sense.

I remember there was one video with a woman stating because she's a woman, men should have no say in abortion. And then he just comes back with... in a time when women are asking for more rights, you want to take away the potential right of a father?

Wrecked.

HAHAHA I like that.

What about, Milo Yiannopoulous?