I agree that it'd be more satisfying if that happened. Where we disagree is that I don't think it's worth the extra satisfaction if we win as a trade off with a lower chance of winning. And I can live with their crowd going on like twits about it - how would we notice a difference?yeah maybe but as a Club it reeks of weakness and that's how other fans would see it as well. Why would we put ourselves in the potential situation of that when we could just get on with it and play all comers? doesn't make sense to me.
The only reason is that we would fear him tearing us a new one but conversley people have been saying how he's playing shit,can't defend etc.Fickle to say the least. Let's just get on with it and play the best and try to bury him. Much more satisfying imo
weakI agree that it'd be more satisfying if that happened. Where we disagree is that I don't think it's worth the extra satisfaction if we win as a trade off with a lower chance of winning. And I can live with their crowd going on like twits about it - how would we notice a difference?
You're the one worried about what other fans will think, not me. Does it get more weak than that?weak
We somehow have an uncanny ability of always playing the Broncs come Sept Finals.Imagine the uproar if Dogs play Broncs is the GF and the clasue is activated.
The Dogs would have to yield to the pressure.
yeah it does. Worrying about losing by playing Barba so going out of our way not to. As you would do.You're the one worried about what other fans will think, not me. Does it get more weak than that?
i remember only 2 occasions since the nrl tbhWe somehow have an uncanny ability of always playing the Broncs come Sept Finals.
Yeah I was trying to think of any other time, I hate playing the Broncsi remember only 2 occasions since the nrl tbh
I thought winning was important to you?yeah it does. Worrying about losing by playing Barba so going out of our way not to. As you would do.
I don't wish to repeat myself over. You have a different way of looking at this which is great. I think you're a peaheart, you think I'm an egotistical wanker.I thought winning was important to you?
It's this simple - you should always do what the other team would like *least*. They're about to pay $1M for Barba - they want him to play every game. So we take that from them. Simple. Crapping on about weakness is displaying your own weakness - that protecting your ego is apparently more important than winning
Wanker? No. Tragic sufferer of traumatic head injury? Yes.I don't wish to repeat myself over. You have a different way of looking at this which is great. I think you're a peaheart, you think I'm an egotistical wanker.
mate get over it. If you have a different view then great. I'd rather win by playing the best and winning that way rather than having excuses for the win over our heads. No need to get up on the blocks over it.Wanker? No. Tragic sufferer of traumatic head injury? Yes.
I swear to god I thought the exact same thing lol