NRL will significantly increase cash grants to its clubs

Status
Not open for further replies.

will.i.am

Benchwarmer
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
7,098
Reaction score
11
Brent Read From: The Australian July 20, 2011 12:00AM

STRUGGLING NRL clubs are set to receive the kiss of life tomorrow when chief executive David Gallop outlines plans to use money from the the game's next television deal to dramatically increase the size of the grant from 2013.

.Gallop and broadcasting consultant Colin Smith are scheduled to make presentations as part of a summit on the game's future, which will be attended by chief executives and chairmen from all 16 clubs.

The most significant issues are the season schedule from 2013 and negotiations over the next broadcasting deal.

The Australian understands the NRL will outline a series of scenarios for the TV rights, which some optimistic officials hope could generate as much as $1 billion over five years, from 2013.

The NRL is expected to propose significant increases in the amount of money it dispenses to the clubs each year.

That should appease the concerns of club chairmen, who will hold their own meeting before the summit to discuss where they think the game should head under an independent commission.

Central to their concerns is the financial future of their clubs. With the clubs appeased, the focus will switch to the players, who are hoping for a significant increase in their own pay when the broadcasting deal comes to fruition.

However, the NRL's desire to improve the lot of its clubs could come at the expense of the players. Rugby League Professionals Association chief executive David Garnsey met the NRL yesterday and was taken through the proposed structure of the competition from 2013.

It is understood that proposal, which one official described

as revolutionary yesterday, includes the scrapping of City-Country, shifting State of Origin games to Monday nights and the remainder of the representative calendar moved to the end of the year.

It is also understood there will be greater protection of clubs with a high number of representatives, a move designed to ease the load on the game's elite players.

Yet the NRL did not disclose its plans for the salary cap at the meeting, perhaps wary of alienating the players before the TV deal is completed.

"The purpose of the meeting is to drill down into a couple of key issues rather than trying to look at everything in the game at this stage of the season," Gallop said.

"Those issues are the future structure of the broadcasting rights and the impact of the broadcasting rights on the level of the salary cap and the grant.

"We have had a long-held view that we wanted the grant to equal, if not exceed, the cap to provide financial stability to the clubs and certainly the scenarios we are looking at are going to to do that."

South Sydney chairman Nick Pappas will also address the meeting and announce the game's inaugural eight independent commissioners, who were confirmed at a meeting of stakeholders on Monday.

Meanwhile, officials are optimistic the NRL's legal stoush with Queensland coach Mal Meninga could be resolved by the end of the week as talks continue.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...nts-to-its-clubs/story-e6frg7mf-1226097854496
 

KelpiesHuskies

Kennel Established
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
703
Reaction score
64
This could not come soon enough. Finally the tv stations are going to pay what the game is worth.
 

Parra_Power

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
7,729
Reaction score
0
This could not come soon enough. Finally the tv stations are going to pay what the game is worth.
Music to my ears. If getting the top 77 out of 100 programs on a yearly basis on Pay TV and high subscription rates for key areas is not enough to jack up the price of the deal then what the hell will???
 

Pom_81

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
3,380
Reaction score
75
The downside of this is that it will encourage basket case NSW teams to stay as they are. What the comp actually needs is for the NRL to offer a huge slice of cash to someone like Cronulla to bu**er off to Perth. It's not going to happen, but it would be better for the whole league and future TV deals.

If the league can lose foundation clubs like Balmain, Western Suburbs, North Sydney, St George (as a standalone entity) it can surely cope with losing the youngest Sydney team and one with no heritage of success.
 

Parra_Power

Kennel Addict
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
7,729
Reaction score
0
The downside of this is that it will encourage basket case NSW teams to stay as they are. What the comp actually needs is for the NRL to offer a huge slice of cash to someone like Cronulla to bu**er off to Perth. It's not going to happen, but it would be better for the whole league and future TV deals.

If the league can lose foundation clubs like Balmain, Western Suburbs, North Sydney, St George (as a standalone entity) it can surely cope with losing the youngest Sydney team and one with no heritage of success.
I wonder how much of the Sydney populace actually support the Sharks... wouldn't be much. Cutting the Sharks would see some benefits but hey... I never in favour of the culling of a club because of its lack of popularity... that's for another time though. Hoping to see exactly how much can the clubs expect to see as an increase in the grants. Judging by the proposed figures, its looking very good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top