- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,588
- Reaction score
- 20,581
That's a bit cynical. Who says they aren't part of the reason we are winning? Flanno has been steering the team around pretty well... if the team was rudderless, we wouldn't be winning. And Allan has been important for us defensively. He also showed some nice touches in attack on Sunday. I don't think they are playing better because we are winning. I think they are playing better for the same reasons most of the squad is playing better - better coaching, growing team spirit and the confidence which comes with those two things. Just look at how much Elliott has improved under a better coach for evidence of that.You're the funniest lol
I wouldn't say they are not contributing, but it's because the team is winning.
I've said it to you before, I like some of Flanno's off the ball work, defense, scrambling defense, his 1%'s. He does contribute to the team. But we can't have him long term. If we're ever going to be a top 4 side and challenge for the premiership our halfback needs to posses exceptional attacking capabilities and a strong leader. He just doesn't have that bro.
If we made a grand final with Hodkinson, no reason we can't do so with Flanno. Hodko was far from a superstar. He was a no fuss, unflashy organiser with dicky knees, and even managed to help the Blues to an origin series win. You don't need an elite halfback to build a winning team if you have the right players around them. If we can sign a top line halfback down the track, all good, but the reality is, there's nobody available who fits that bill right now. And we shouldn't be rushing to sign someone who wouldn't be a significant upgrade. I'm not saying he has to be here for 10 years....just that there isn't a better alternative right now, he is not on much money by halfback standards and he is playing decent footy.... so people should stop piling shit on him.