I like that you've finally stopped pretending that you're not a climate denier.
Poor choice of words from me. What I was trying to say is:
- If you are a strong advocate of man made climate change and are genuinely trying to understand why people hold an opposite view, then perhaps the article i attached will show you why.
Using the climate denier tag is just an attempt to conflate holocaust denial with climate change and paint people as morally bankrupt to win an argument without ever having to talk about anything meaningful.
As I've said before:
I believe that the climate changes.
- I'm open to the possibility that humans have had some impact on some of the changes over the last 100 years.
- I'm open to the idea that some of the 'consequences' of climate change may actually be beneficial (and not negative) to life on earth.
- I believe that most of the climate change debate has been hijacked by people on the left and by extension this includes most media types, and used to silence.people into submission.
- It's a disgusting mistake to hide behind teenagers and even younger school students as political weapons to push your own agenda.
The debate overall would be better served if concious choices were made such as:
- Removing any school age children from the debate and providing them with the full range of opinions rather than only one
- Refusing to allow school age children to participate at climate change forums (obviously I'm referring to the mentally ill kid from Sweden)
- Stop attempting to link every single weather event to climate change
- Start discussing practical responses to a slightly warmer climate (such as how we better manage fuel loads) and also how we manage the electricity grid given there will be higher base load demands due to air conditioning uses.