Hypothetical question. What if the board signed Manu, Grant, and Thompson, but at the same time got fooled by a developer and leased half the Belmore grounds for a song, get implicated big time in a matter before the ICAC, two board members photographed with a ladyboy on a trip to SEA, substantiated information of discussions with the NRL to move the club to Perth, and Hill gets fired and the first person interviewed to replace him has a wig and recently got let go by RA.
Should they still be voted back in?