Dear Bradley,
I'm normally accustomed to reading steaming piles of proverbial from yourself, and tonight you truly outdid yourself.
So your beloved Roosters lost, but that doesn't mean that you'll write a fair article. No way would you let journalistic integrity get in the way of a good, old fashioned gripe.
Are you a cyclops, because the article was so blatantly one eyed it wasn't funny.
Credit given where credit due. Robinsons Roosters were comprehensively outplayed to make it... Oh that's right, 2 wins and 3 losses.
Remind me again what position and for how long you played football for? Oh wait, you were the fat nerdy kid in the corner getting bullied, and now you've just taking that bullying to a new level, with your newfound powers of journalism.
Does it hurt you to write a single positive comment about my side comprehensively outclassing a "done" Roosters side.
The chickens are cooked mate, and the proof was in the words of Robinson pre-game when he said the Roosters struggle against better defending sides.
Anyway, theres not much more to debate, unless we are talking about a mass debate, and god knows that you and our friends at channel 9 love nothing more than a "lengthy debate" about Sorry But Who, sorry I meant Sonny Bill Williams.
Please, go out tomorrow to Westfields and do some shopping. Buy yourself a clue, or maybe "Dummies Guide to being a success journalist", because until you do you'll always be a hack journo, in the shadows of men like Danny Weidler.
Regards,
<name supressed>
