News DEAN NOT PAYING OFF FOR BULLDOGS

NPC83

Kennel Addict
Gilded
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
10,922
My bad. I didn't read the article properly. 14.7 points average over the past three seasons.
Yeah I figured I think this year besides the dragons game we score usually 1-2 tries per game which is a concern. For me personally I’m ok with paying overs for say a Cotric cause Wakeham and Foran need strike players to work with and I think we’ll score more points.
 

Kelpie03

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
4,499
Reaction score
3,252
Poor old Deano is totally lost, he’s picking all the backs out of position trying to put square pegs in round holes and he has continued on with Hasslers work of running Tolman on every single 4th tackle no matter where we are on the field or attacking position

our only bright spot who could make breaks has been dropped for the last 2 weeks, our best forward can barely get on the field, JMK seems undroppable even though Cogger played 100% better (and was then banished) and we have an actual dummy half Katoa who can not get a run at all

we have an actual fullback in meany who isn’t allowed off the wing where he provides fuckall, he’s not the greatest full back but he can catch a bomb and our best attacking winger in years in smith is now being played as the comps worst centre

And don’t get me started on Napa

when Pay said he was going to bring the madness I never thought he meant it in regards to team selections
What's the difference between madness and insanity anyway.
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,996
Reaction score
19,257
Yeah I figured I think this year besides the dragons game we score usually 1-2 tries per game which is a concern. For me personally I’m ok with paying overs for say a Cotric cause Wakeham and Foran need strike players to work with and I think we’ll score more points.
A top hooker and a top strike centre has to be the priority in recruitment. Koroisau and Ramien would be been nice.
 

Novdoggie

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
4,598
In regards to the Cotric attempted signing it tells me Pay will not be coach after this year. I say this because I have no doubt due to Pay and Ricky Stuart having such a close relationship they would have a gentlemans agreement not to poach each other's players.

Yes, this kind of agreement does go on these days with old school players and men which I'm sure is to the surprise of the younger generations of today. Its called a handshake agreement which to these men is more binding than a signature on a piece of paper.

As the Dogs are fighting for Cotrics' signature Pay won't be there in 2021.
 

NPC83

Kennel Addict
Gilded
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
10,922
In regards to the Cotric attempted signing it tells me Pay will not be coach after this year. I say this because I have no doubt due to Pay and Ricky Stuart having such a close relationship they would have a gentlemans agreement not to poach each other's players.

Yes, this kind of agreement does go on these days with old school players and men which I'm sure is to the surprise of the younger generations of today. Its called a handshake agreement which to these men is more binding than a signature on a piece of paper.

As the Dogs are fighting for Cotrics' signature Pay won't be there in 2021.
I believe also they have a similar agreement. But would it be indefinitely? I don’t think so. Maybe first 3 years. Something like that. Canberra were also reportedly interested in Elliot as well so...
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,907
Reaction score
49,333
Nathan Brown had a 26% win rate at the Knights (more than half a year with a competitive roster, almost one and a half years with Ponga and Pearce). That's worse than Pay's 34% win rate.

I couldn't tell you where we were expected to finish in 2018 (I do know we lost multiple players during the season) but I do know in 2019 we were tipped for the wooden spoon. We lost multiple players at the end of the 2018 season, the Morris brothers and Klemmer (not replaced). Even tho we were tipped for the wooden spoon in 2019 the team and Pay were able to finish 12th and three points outside the eight. From being tipped to finish wooden spooners that's an over achievement (not debatable). Even with this finish, due to no recruitment (nothing meaningful) and actually instead losing two players (CHN and Okunbor) who would of made the starting 13 we were tipped to come 15th in 2020. We also have to remember teams that under performed in 2019 still have a better roster on paper than us as well as other clubs recruiting (e.g. Tigers and Cowboys). To make things worse we lost two of our best and most influential players, Hopoate and Elliott (out for the season). This season is going as expected and the only thing we have to do (meet expectations) is avoid the wooden spoon (same as last year and why Pay was extended). We haven't been favourites to win any game we've played but we've come away with one win (the Dragons, who are better than us on paper).

Why have we scored an average of 14.1* points per game?

Our spine consists of Hopoate (injured), Foran, Wakeham and JMK. DWZ and Lewis have also been in the spine. That's one of the worst spines in the NRL. Foran has been injured for 1/3 of the NRL games played during his time at the club (on big money). JMK is possibly the worst starting hooker in the NRL. Good players = Hopoate and Foran. Wakeham on potential.

Does it get better in the backs? Meaney, Reimis, Montoya and Crichton. Hopoate has also been in the backs. Three of these players are reserve grade wingers (fullback is regards to Meaney). We're so weak in the centres we're forced to play two wingers there. I don't need to say anymore. That's one of the worst back lines in the NRL. Good players = Hopoate. Reimis on potential.

How about the forwards? Tolman, Napa, RFM, Jackson and Elliott (injured). Tolman and Napa are the worst front row pairing in the NRL. Elliott is the only forward on ability that would make another top eight teams roster. Thompson should be a massive boost but we're yet to see him play in the NRL and he's going to cancel out Elliott being injured. Good players = Elliott and Thompson(?).

Even with one of, if not, the worst rosters in the NRL. This year we've played well more games than not. Eels, Dragons, Sharks and Rabbitohs. If we just had a top hooker and centre alone we'd be at least 4/8 (7th-11th on the NRL ladder). Even tho we're 1/8 you can't question the teams effort. The players are playing for the coach and while we don't have a competitive roster that's the most important thing. No ones saying Pay's a super coach but he's done a terrific job overall with the roster and cards he's been dealt so unless a top coach is available he deserves at least one more year and a chance with a competitive roster.
Your warped interpretation of playing well in resounding losses doesn't count in the win/loss column unfortunately.

Please stop referring to Nathan Brown every time you defend Pay. Using one horrible coach to defend another hardly bolsters your argument...

You talk about the spine lacking points, well who keeps picking a fullback who can't pass and a hooker who runs around like a headless chicken in those positions every week? As well as everyone else he plays out of position..

Are you really saying we don't have players who are capable of scoring more than 11 points a game? I really don't know why you see the need to continually defend Pay on the indefensible and continue to lower the bar every week.
 
Last edited:

Straight18

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
2,042
Reaction score
1,152
People call our players lemons and pay has nothing to work with. Bullshit. We have kiwi reps, origin reps, and so on.
They have all just gone backwards under our coaching staff. Some still play rep football and perform well under better coaching than they do with us. We cant attract a hooker because pay tells them they will only be backup for jmk.
Only lemons pay has are the ones hes rolling around with numbers on them to decide who plays where each week.
Get us a fucking coach for fuck sake !
 

GDR

Kennel Addict
2 x Gilded
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
6,758
Reaction score
10,247
In regards to the Cotric attempted signing it tells me Pay will not be coach after this year. I say this because I have no doubt due to Pay and Ricky Stuart having such a close relationship they would have a gentlemans agreement not to poach each other's players.

Yes, this kind of agreement does go on these days with old school players and men which I'm sure is to the surprise of the younger generations of today. Its called a handshake agreement which to these men is more binding than a signature on a piece of paper.

As the Dogs are fighting for Cotrics' signature Pay won't be there in 2021.
Ahm ahm Clay Priest, ahm ahm..
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,996
Reaction score
19,257
Your warped interpretation of playing well in resounding losses doesn't count in the win/loss column unfortunately.

Please stop referring to Nathan Brown every time you defend Pay. Using one horrible coach to defend another hardly bolsters your argument...

You talk about the spine lacking points, well who keeps picking a fullback who can't pass and a hooker who runs around like a headless chicken in those positions every week? As well as everyone else he plays out of position..

Are you really saying we don't have players who are capable of scoring more than 11 points a game? I really don't know why you see the need to continually defend Pay on the indefensible and continue to lower the bar every week.
Until we have a competitive roster the W/L column doesn't mean anything to me. The eye test is more important (subjective, but I'm obviously going to think I'm right).

Nathan Brown is a rebuild coach, so is Pay. Nathan Brown got one year with a competitive roster. Pay is yet to fail to meet expectations and overachieved last year.

We don't have the cattle. Picking Meaney (reserve grade fullback) at fullback doesn't change anything. That's the same with picking Katoa (reserve grade hooker) at hooker. We don't have players good enough to replace players in these positions. Averillo is a five-eighth/fullback and if reserve grade was going on he'd be developing in one of those positions there. Select any spine you want and it's one of the worst, if not, the worst in the NRL. I'm not saying Pay's selecting the team I 100% want but it's subjective. We also have an opinion from the outside (we're not at training). Nothing will change until we recruit top players.

I currently blame (in order): past board > current board > players > coach. This order will change next year.
 

Suave

Kennel Participant
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Messages
480
Reaction score
1,479
Think we all know how this will go down. Pay will get a 1-2 year extension, not because he deserves it but because the board are indecisive and lacked the foresight to do something about this sooner. Bank on it.

I’m glad at least some elements of the media are putting pressure on Pay. But let’s be honest, you think the media give 2 shites about whether we become a force again? I’d be surprised if they even watch our games. Hell if I wasn’t a supporter I would absolutely not waste any time watching a team that can barely score 2 tries in 80 mins. For 3 years now. It’s more riveting watching the screensaver on my laptop.

Which brings me to the next point on some fans still pushing the ‘Pay has done well with what he’s had to work with’ bandwagon. The argument completely revolves around roster (which we’re all painfully aware of) and the odds before the season started (like that matters? So if we’re tipped to come 14th next year and we come 13th, Pay has overachieved again? Is that how this works?). But what majority of anti-Payers are saying is look beyond the roster - look at structure of play, player development, developing player combos, squad management, use of interchange, etc. All indicators of whether a coach knows what he’s doing or not. All severely lacking.

If the argument is sure Pay isn’t a good coach but what are the options at this late stage? I can sort of cop that. But this Pay deserves our sympathy and pat on the back rubbish is nonsense. Open your eyes and watch the games, as painful as that can be sometimes.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,907
Reaction score
49,333
Until we have a competitive roster the W/L column doesn't mean anything to me. The eye test is more important (subjective, but I'm obviously going to think I'm right).

Nathan Brown is a rebuild coach, so is Pay. Nathan Brown got one year with a competitive roster. Pay is yet to fail to meet expectations and overachieved last year.

We don't have the cattle. Picking Meaney (reserve grade fullback) at fullback doesn't change anything. That's the same with picking Katoa (reserve grade hooker) at hooker. We don't have players good enough to replace players in these positions. Averillo is a five-eighth/fullback and if reserve grade was going on he'd be developing in one of those positions there. Select any spine you want and it's one of the worst, if not, the worst in the NRL. I'm not saying Pay's selecting the team I 100% want but it's subjective. We also have an opinion from the outside (we're not at training). Nothing will change until we recruit top players.

I currently blame (in order): past board > current board > players > coach. This order will change next year.
I agree about wins and losses. But I want to see improvement and enterprising play. How does this current team pass anyone's eye test? Even Stevie Wonder could see that this attack is ugly.

Pay is yet to fail and has overachieved? Haha. Okay.. I'll stop there. There's just no response to that. I'll see you at the ticker tape parade for Pay's crowning overachievement when we're officially given the spoon.
 

Novdoggie

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
4,598
I believe also they have a similar agreement. But would it be indefinitely? I don’t think so. Maybe first 3 years. Something like that. Canberra were also reportedly interested in Elliot as well so...
Not indefinite while both are coaching no matter how many years in my opinion.

Exactly my point Canberra interested in Elliot because Pay won't be there next year and their handshake agreement will be non existent. Tit for tat between clubs.
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,996
Reaction score
19,257
I agree about wins and losses. But I want to see improvement and enterprising play. How does this current team pass anyone's eye test? Even Stevie Wonder could see that this attack is ugly.

Pay is yet to fail and has overachieved? Haha. Okay.. I'll stop there. There's just no response to that. I'll see you at the ticker tape parade for Pay's overachievement when we're officially given the spoon.
We have different expectations but I tend to think mine are more realistic. That's why our opinions are so far apart. I also said Pay has to avoid the wooden spoon but regardless we need to make a decision on who our coach for 2021 is now. From what I've seen so far I'm happy to extend Pay for one more year.
 

Novdoggie

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
4,598
Ahm ahm Clay Priest, ahm ahm..
Yes and that proves my point where they will make agreements with each other and in each others interest.
Canberra offloaded Priest, we didn't poach him
 

Ant2611

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
2,557
Reaction score
2,218
I like this post, No 1. Unfortunately for us everything you say is 100% correct.
Poor old Deano is totally lost, he’s picking all the backs out of position trying to put square pegs in round holes and he has continued on with Hasslers work of running Tolman on every single 4th tackle no matter where we are on the field or attacking position

our only bright spot who could make breaks has been dropped for the last 2 weeks, our best forward can barely get on the field, JMK seems undroppable even though Cogger played 100% better (and was then banished) and we have an actual dummy half Katoa who can not get a run at all

we have an actual fullback in meany who isn’t allowed off the wing where he provides fuckall, he’s not the greatest full back but he can catch a bomb and our best attacking winger in years in smith is now being played as the comps worst centre

And don’t get me started on Napa

when Pay said he was going to bring the madness I never thought he meant it in regards to team selections
 

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,996
Reaction score
19,257
Think we all know how this will go down. Pay will get a 1-2 year extension, not because he deserves it but because the board are indecisive and lacked the foresight to do something about this sooner. Bank on it.

I’m glad at least some elements of the media are putting pressure on Pay. But let’s be honest, you think the media give 2 shites about whether we become a force again? I’d be surprised if they even watch our games. Hell if I wasn’t a supporter I would absolutely not waste any time watching a team that can barely score 2 tries in 80 mins. For 3 years now. It’s more riveting watching the screensaver on my laptop.

Which brings me to the next point on some fans still pushing the ‘Pay has done well with what he’s had to work with’ bandwagon. The argument completely revolves around roster (which we’re all painfully aware of) and the odds before the season started (like that matters? So if we’re tipped to come 14th next year and we come 13th, Pay has overachieved again? Is that how this works?). But what majority of anti-Payers are saying is look beyond the roster - look at structure of play, player development, developing player combos, squad management, use of interchange, etc. All indicators of whether a coach knows what he’s doing or not. All severely lacking.

If the argument is sure Pay isn’t a good coach but what are the options at this late stage? I can sort of cop that. But this Pay deserves our sympathy and pat on the back rubbish is nonsense. Open your eyes and watch the games, as painful as that can be sometimes.
If we're tipped to come 14th next year then recruitment was a fail. That's more of an issue with our current board. If we're predicted to finish 10th and Pay finishes 9th he's met expectations (tipped for the wooden spoon and finishing 12th is overachieving). I still think we'll be one of the most improved sides next year but that's mainly because of injection of talent into the roster and especially in key areas (e.g. hooker). I don't think there's any reason why we can't recruit players to make us a top eight roster. Until Pay fails to meet expectations unless a top coach is available it makes little to no sense to replace him.

Also regards to structure of play, this is a quote from Bennett's ("super coach") press conference, "They turned up, they tried really hard Canterbury... I've been watching a bit of video about them and they were very organised and knew what they were doing... you got to understand that they were playing pretty good Canterbury." We were the better "team" against the Rabbitohs last week but they just have more individual talent.
 
Last edited:

NPC83

Kennel Addict
Gilded
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
6,988
Reaction score
10,922
Not indefinite while both are coaching no matter how many years in my opinion.

Exactly my point Canberra interested in Elliot because Pay won't be there next year and their handshake agreement will be non existent. Tit for tat between clubs.
Yeah fair enough. Interesting mate. .. see how we go.
 

Bulldogsteve

Banned
Premium Member
In the Sin Bin
SC H2H Champion
SC Top Scorer
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
8,007
Reaction score
14,535
i will reserve judgement until after saturday night, we change our attacking style last week, lets see if that continues with the addition of thompson
 
Top