Nope . Not if the Frawley / Reynolds combo keeps flourishing.It shouldnt even be in question in my opiniin. However the question i have is do we need to sign foran or cronk???
Nope it's not worth losing frawley to get cronk for 1 or two seasons. I'm not in anyway trying to suggest frawley is better than cronk but ya gotta look out for the future, frawley looks to have a very bright one from what we have seen.It shouldnt even be in question in my opiniin. However the question i have is do we need to sign foran or cronk???
Josh Reynolds bleeds blue and white.yes he does somethings at times that don't make sense,but we can never argue that he never gives 110%.With Frawley playing half Reynolds can play his own game.We don't need Cronk or Foran.Frawley will only get better,and I'm sure he will turn out to be a top half.Lets not make the same mistake we did with sezer.Must be re-signed.
HE SURE HAS COME GOOD SINCE THERE WAS MENTION OF HIM BEING LET GO,SO MAYBE JUST A 2 YEAR CONTRACT TO KEEP HIM HUNGRY
Then when he re-signs he will become crap again.HE SURE HAS COME GOOD SINCE THERE WAS MENTION OF HIM BEING LET GO,SO MAYBE JUST A 2 YEAR CONTRACT TO KEEP HIM HUNGRY
He was never shit until Mbye played in the Halves with him. Mbye's service form dummy half was mint. Locked in for many seasons to come please.Then when he re-signs he will become crap again.
Well, 1 good game this week......... maybe you haven't been watching before today for the season?No thanks.. hes had over 100 games at No6
one good game and everyone is losing there mind
this will hopefully be his last year as canterburys No6
JR was a absolute pathetic in first half before Frawley came on.
been watching since 2011Well, 1 good game this week......... maybe you haven't been watching before today for the season?